.. Ross Patterson's Blog imported post, created by `$ ./bin/rfc822-to-post` on Mar 15, 2021. .. meta:: :description: My experiences with Chameleon, testing compatibility and z3c.form :keywords: Plone, Zope .. post:: Oct 07, 2010 :tags: Plone, Zope :author: Ross Patterson :redirect: @@redirect-to-uuid/b34dae498221e9fb0302e6884aa12643 #################### Trying out Chameleon #################### My experiences with Chameleon, testing compatibility and z3c.form I'm about to upgrade a sizable client deployment to Plone 4 and wanted to see if I could switch to the `Chameleon `_ template engine at the same time. I'm recording things I found here: Testing both with and without Chameleon ======================================= For some add-ons of mine, I found it useful to be able to run the tests both with and without Chameleon. It turns out to be `remarkably simple `_ with buildout. Integrating cmf.pt and z3c.form =============================== There are some gotchas when using both cmf.pt and z3c.form together. You have to be sure to include z3c.ptcompat, which you can do with z3c.form's poorly named "extra" extras_require. I did this in my project's setup.py by adding the following:: install_requires=[ ... 'z3c.form[extra]<2.3dev', ... Unfortunately, z3c.ptcompat uses an environment variable to switch on the use of Chameleon so you have to add the environment variable to the buildout instances and test runners:: [instance] ... environment-vars = PREFER_Z3C_PT True ... [test] ... environment = testenv ... [testenv] PREFER_Z3C_PT = True .. update:: Oct 07, 2010 Imported from Plone on Mar 15, 2021. The date for this update is the last modified date in Plone.